October 2023

archive

Home October 2023

Exemple

Idols Not Made With Hands – Veith

Exodus 20:4 “You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of anything in heaven bbove or on the earth beneath or in the waters below” — Idolatry is rejection of truth and an attempt to replace God — Veith, G. E., Jr. (1994b). Postmodern Times: A Christian Guide to Contemporary Thought and Culture. Crossway, p. 63 – NIV

              Reflexive images brought to mind by the mention of particular words offer efficiency of thought, but may hinder deeper insights into a heavier topic. The mention of idols quickly brings to mind statues small and large, ancient civilizations like Greece or modern tribal groups with carved poles. As a Christian, these idols repulse our sensibilities and are easier to reject. Isaiah mocked the idea of carving an idol out of wood while using the left-overs to warm himself (44:14-17).

              Mentally stopping at imagining such a ridiculous physical object as our recipient of worship endangers us by not exposing other less conspicuous idols in our lives. Veith in his book, Postmodern Times, goes deeper by stating that “Idolatry is rejection of truth and an attempt to replace God”. Ultimately, the sin of idolatry arises from any active or passive placing of something above God. He connects the rejection of truth with such an act of replacing God because God is truth and the source of all truth we may possess.

              From the Old Testament, we see not only the Gentile peoples worshipping other idols, but the very people of God, the Hebrews falling prey to this rejection of God and His truth. Throughout history, the heart and mind of mind collaborate to create alternatives to the God of the Scriptures, and thus create idols sometimes physical and sometimes simply abstract ideals. Today, our society continues and somewhat extends this idolatry by denying truth altogether.

              By reaching such a low point in our understanding of our reality, thinking that truth either does not exist or that we are able to create our own truth, we are creating idols of such mental rationalizations. In order to tear down such idols in our own thinking, we must return to aligning our beliefs and values with God’s truth such that our thoughts and feelings align with His, thus directing our practices both individually and collectively after His ways rather than the false idols of our increasingly ungodly culture. We and others around us who follow this example will flourish in God’s blessing through such work.

Read More →
Exemple

Jurisdictional Spheres

Excerpt #3 of “Analysis of Romans 13:1-7 in Light of the Analogy of Scripture”

               Given the length of the full paper I recently published on this site, I am posting excerpts which emphasize specific principles within the paper.  Hopefully, these excerpts will not only encourage you to read the actual paper, but also think more deeply about the role of Romans 13:1-7 in our response to both Godly and ungodly civil government in our day and time.  A proper understanding and obedience to Scripture is critical today as always.  This particular Scripture has been mishandled in so many ways that a methodical approach to its exegesis is needed to avoid further error by both individual Christians and the broader church.  The pressures being exerted upon true Christianity by the contemporary civil government demand a Biblical response informed by Romans 13:1-7 and the other Scriptures addressed within this paper.

               (These excerpts are posted in the order as found in the paper, but do not include the entirety of the paper which combined.  Only the PDF contains all sections of the paper.)

Jurisdictional Spheres

               Within each jurisdictional sphere, the responsibilities of the respective jurisdiction are governed by the Law of God as set forth in the Scripture.  God’s Law defines the extent of their authority and their responsibility.  The assumed division between “sacred” responsibility and “secular” responsibility is a false dichotomy . God’s law governs all people and all areas.  Romans 3:23’s explicit declaration that all have sinned and fallen short implies that all were under some form of law in order to sin, so God’s law is for all people.  Several examples demonstrate that all jurisdictions are under God’s law without distinct or complete separation between sacred and secular (Grant, 18-20).  Under Israel’s theocratic government both the appointed judges of Deuteronomy 16:18 and the Levites of Deuteronomy 17:8-9 were addressed as judging the people in regards to both religious and civil matters. Both areas were ultimately under God’s Law (Hoffecker, 164).  In the subsequent theocratic monarchy described in Deuteronomy 17:15, Israel’s king was to have both civil and religious duties.  In I Corinthians 6:1-7, Paul admonishes fellow Christians to take their disputes before other believers in the Church body rather than before the civil authorities.  In the New Testament, church members were therefore to judge civil matters between themselves.

               The Scriptures then give explicit principles within various jurisdictions, which show that God’s law applies to each of these areas.  Ephesians 6:5-9 and Colossians 4:22-5:1 address it at the occupational level.  The family is delegated educational responsibility in Deuteronomy 6:6-9 and Ephesians 6:1-4 while disciplinary authority is explicit in Proverbs 23:13-14 as well as other verses.  The property owner or farmer is given responsibility for charity in Leviticus 19:9 and the church shares some of that charitable responsibility for widows in I Timothy chapter 5.  At the civil authority level, it is also expressed.  In Numbers 10, Moses as head of the people was responsible for using the silver trumpets to summons or alarm the people to different purposes.  Jesus’ response to the paying of taxes also exhibits the rightful authority of civil government within its jurisdiction (Grant 24).  The apostles’ testimony before the Sanhedrin in Acts demonstrates a recognition of civil and religious authority combined.

Read MORE HERE.

Read More →
Exemple

(Continued from Part 1)

               Physical health should be something that enables us to love God and our neighbors more fully.  Self-caused limitations created out of poor stewardship of physical health can limit our ability to care for family and participate productively in community. For example, a lifestyle with overindulgence in food which leads to heart disease or uncontrolled diabetes could prevent one from productive labor to care for one’s family financially.  On the other end, over-emphasis on personal physical health can be a detriment to caring for our family if one is spending so much time on physical self-care that their family is neglected.  Physical health can therefore be an empowerment to the higher goals or a hindrance, even an idol. 

               Growing our minds and balancing our emotions deserve recognition as part of our stewardship of the gift of life as well.  Greater knowledge or greater wisdom may serve not only us but those under our care or under our leadership.  A greater knowledge of God enables greater serve to His purposes.  A greater knowledge of the created world enables more accurate and likely more productive benefitting others.  A greater wisdom in reasoning through the dynamics of life enables fruit for not only self but for multitudes of others around us.  Similar to the possibilities for a downside to emphasizing physical health, there may be downsides to pursuing intellectual health also.  Knowledge for the sake of knowledge alone or for the sake of using that knowledge as power over others can turn this into sinful attitudes and behaviors.  The pursuit of knowledge may become an idol and this possibility must be guarded against.

                Growing our minds and our bodies, again, cannot come at the expense of our spirits.  Idolizing the fitness of our bodies or minds will take away from that which is eternal.  Loving God and our neighbor cannot be in mind or in body alone.  Our physical bodies and the physical minds they care will come to an end at some point.  In the Bible we read that physical care of our bodies have some value, but the greater care is for the spirit in its walk before God (I Timothy 4:8).  Our walk with others in relationship is tied up also with this walk with God.  Yet, even the spiritual emphases can become an idol.  The pharisees were instructed by Jesus to stop disobeying the commandment to honor father and mother when they gave their inheritance to temples rather than to care for parents.  When one moves into the realm of believing only the spiritual has any value but not the physical world, one moves into philosophy, particularly Greek philosophy rather than theology.  This contrasts with the “new bodies” in the ”new heavens” we will receive and will experience respectively in the end times. 

               From here we can evaluate what virtues to practice in how they serve this higher goal of loving God and loving our neighbor.  We can ask if something has become an idol in our lives and overtaken the higher goals.  Questions include:

1.            Has physical fitness become an inordinate part of our lives?

2.            Has control of food become an obsession that is causing more harm to family or others?

3.            Has study of physical reality distracted or distorted from pursuing a knowledge and wisdom of spiritual reality?

4.            Has a pursuit of knowledge about God overtaken relationship with God and with His children?

We can ask in what way is something serving the higher goals.

1.            Does your physical fitness enable present relationship with God and others?

2.           Does your physical fitness serve to steward one’s health for the good of not only self but others? Long life with family? Less money spent in the future on health care?  More ability to be with family?

3.            Does your  healthy eating do likewise in stewarding health?

4.            Does your knowledge about God lead to a better relationship with God and with other mankind?

               The virtues are then rooted in pursuit of the higher goals of loving God and loving neighbor.  One should view oneself as a steward of a gift of life that is meant to not only benefit yourself but serve God and others.  Caring for one’s body becomes a responsibility but should not become an idol.  Pursuing knowledge and soundness of mind equips one to serve God more truly and mankind more productively.  Pursing spiritual health as a priority, but not exclusively, enables one to use the physical fitness and the mental fitness to serve God and others more truly.  Walking each day with the virtues inherent in stewardship leads to a more abundant life for self and for others.

Next in this Series… “To Be Determined”

Read More →
Exemple

Division of Authority by God

Excerpt #2 of “Analysis of Romans 13:1-7 in Light of the Analogy of Scripture”

               Given the length of the full paper I recently published on this site, I am posting excerpts which emphasize specific principles within the paper.  Hopefully, these excerpts will not only encourage you to read the actual paper, but also think more deeply about the role of Romans 13:1-7 in our response to both Godly and ungodly civil government in our day and time.  A proper understanding and obedience to Scripture is critical today as always.  This particular Scripture has been mishandled in so many ways that a methodical approach to its exegesis is needed to avoid further error by both individual Christians and the broader church.  The pressures being exerted upon true Christianity by the contemporary civil government demand a Biblical response informed by Romans 13:1-7 and the other Scriptures addressed within this paper.

               (These excerpts are posted in the order as found in the paper, but do not include the entirety of the paper which combined.  Only the PDF contains all sections of the paper.)

Division of Authority by God

               In addition to originating and delegating authority, God has divided authority into the earthly jurisdictional spheres of individual, family, church, and various civil governments. Each of these authorities receives delegated authority within their jurisdiction but not authority outside that jurisdiction (Grant, 19).  Only God maintains authority over all areas of life.  Several examples from Scripture collectively demonstrate the universality of this principle.  Self-government is seen in Galatians 5:23 where “self-control can only be maintained by the power of the Spirit (Hagopian) which means it originates in God.  Several Scriptures denote the jurisdiction of the family with its boundaries and responsibilities.  These include the household codes of Ephesians 5:22-6:4 and Colossians 3:18-21, as well as I Timothy 5:8’s consideration of family responsibilities for one another.  In several other Scriptures, church government is established in Acts 20:28, I Peter 5:1-3, Hebrew 13:17, I Timothy 3:1-3, Matthew 18:15-20 and Acts 15.  The servant-hood nature of this authority is authority structure is seen in Matthew 20:25027, Mark 9:35, and John 13:14-15.  Finally, Matthew 22:21 makes clear that Caesar, his jurisdiction of civil government, operates with a defined sphere of responsibility.    “Therefore, render to Cesar the things that are Caesar’s and to God the things that are God’s.”  As in the other spheres, the state’s power does not overrule the power of the ultimate authority in the area of overlap for the state’s power is derived from God and operates appropriately within its defined limits.  George Grant considered this statement of Jesus as affirming both the state’s legitimacy and the state’s limitations (Grant, 24).  Each jurisdiction of authority is limited by God’s ordination.   

Read MORE HERE.

Read More →
Exemple

Excerpt #1 of “Analysis of Romans 13:1-7 in Light of the Analogy of Scripture”

               Given the length of the full paper I recently published on this site, I am posting excerpts which emphasize specific principles within the paper.  Hopefully, these excerpts will not only encourage you to read the actual paper, but also think more deeply about the role of Romans 13:1-7 in our response to both Godly and ungodly civil government in our day and time.  A proper understanding and obedience to Scripture is critical today as always.  This particular Scripture has been mishandled in so many ways that a methodical approach to its exegesis is needed to avoid further error by both individual Christians and the broader church.  The pressures being exerted upon true Christianity by the contemporary civil government demand a Biblical response informed by Romans 13:1-7 and the other Scriptures addressed within this paper.

               (These excerpts are posted in the order as found in the paper, but do not include the entirety of the paper which combined.  Only the PDF contains all sections of the paper.)

God as Ultimate Authority: The First Broad Principle  

               The nature of authority, as portrayed Biblically in both propositions and narrative descriptions, indicates that God remains the ultimate authority throughout all time.  Civil authority, which is a beneficial institution for mankind, originates with God and is then delegated by God who has divided this authority into earthly jurisdictions and directs it through His revealed law.  

               Authority originates with God and is therefore delegated by God.  Romans 13:1-7 addresses this directly in verse one, “For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.” In addition, rulers are called a “servant” (diakonos) of God in verse four and “ministers” (leitourgoi) of God in verse six, indicating that they owe their allegiance to the One from whom their authority was derived (Logos software). …    It is inconsistent with the Scriptures to claim that human governments arise primarily from any “social compact” or “consent of the governed” (Bromiley, 545).  Human governments are God ordained for righteous ends even if enacted through human secondary means.  In addition, men are intended to be in subjection to earthly authorities,….

Read MORE HERE

Read More →
Exemple

               We must avoid “everyone doing what’s right in their own eyes” while avoiding a one size fits all approach that does not adapt for our individuality when attempting to pursue whole person health.  Oughtness or rightness must come from outside of our persons as we cannot depend on our own limited knowledge, reasoning or fallen tendencies. We start with the obedience of the creature to the Creator and then recognize the gift of life and health as an assigned responsibility to nurture.  We are called to act as stewards of this gift, looking to our Creator for what virtues to pursue.  The virtues should not be solely self-directed but ones that promote our ability to love God and love our neighbor as well as care well for ourselves.  We must learn to care for our physical body, our mind, and our spirit in ways that enable us to rightly relate with God and others.   

               Today many gurus and health prophets emphasize health practices and principles which focus almost solely on what the individual gets out of their own health.  These experts sell “feeling good”, “stronger/faster/more fit bodies”, “Peace with nature”, “control of your own health”, and other slogans that do not extend beyond the mundane realm of existence.  They are not necessarily inherently bad values, but at least incomplete values, primarily because they miss out on the obligation which exists beyond one’s self.  At most, some will encourage us to be examples to our children or to do something so we can see our grandchildren one day.  At this basic level, they are not inherently wrong, but they miss out that there is a higher purpose to life’s existence.  Targeting the virtue of doing what is best for only oneself will never fully get at a healthy life because it misses the larger picture.

               The rightness of a proposed virtue to pursue should be evaluated to determine its true worth in pursuing.  We are not our own gods to set our own realities as creation needs a lawgiver, one who determines what is a virtue and the necessary means to achieve those virtues.  Our creaturely limits pose an obstacle to even choosing the right virtues much less achieving them for whole person health.  The limiting influence of fallen emotions and desires means that we are practically guaranteed to pursue the wrong set of virtues if left to our own wills.  Logic and science do not automatically overcome the desires of our fallen natures. 

               Even without the distorting influence of emotions and desires, determining virtues to pursue in health through the assumed emotionless process of science falls short of what we need.  Science neither knows enough about our functioning nor can extrapolate that to virtue to provide a foundation for us.  On one hand, contrary to popular opinion, science does not understand mankind fully from a biologically mechanistic standpoint. Science does not have the ability nor technology to know the dynamic and vastly intricate operations of our physical body at any given moment, much less in an ongoing dynamic sense.  The amount of data required to know and simultaneously process exceeds our capacity.  The computational capacity for even the information we can access is already beyond our ability leaving us with broad probabilities for understanding what is happening within our bodies presently much less for what will happen next in time.  As a result, we are left with an insurmountable obstacle to determining what appears good for our bodies in all circumstances of life.  On the other hand, even if science fully understood how our bodies function, transferring what is into what should be in terms of oughtness in pursuing a particular virtue cannot be proven.  Virtue cannot ultimately be derived from the descriptive nature of science. 

               To move beyond the realm of science and our limits, we must acknowledge the creature – creator distinction with its implications.  We are not our own, but belong to our “potter”, the one who formed us like clay from the earth.   We are beholden to follow the rules of this designer rather than attempt to make up our own rules by our own standards.  We are beholden to submit to the values and pursue the virtues our Creator ordained.  This moves us to an appreciation of this life as a gift which our Creator did not have to bestow upon us in creating us as He did.  When this life we live is viewed as a gift with responsibilities, we can approach its working out as ongoing acts of stewardship.  We are called to care for our health and nurture it so it can serve the purpose our Creator intended for it. 

               With the purpose of stewardship before our eyes, we can ask God what virtues should be our models.  We base these on the purposes He has laid out before us and also the direct instructions He has given us.  Loving God and loving our neighbor are set before us as the two greatest commands.  These two commands sum up the first and second tables of the Law, the Ten Commandments given to Moses on Mount Sinai.  Loving our neighbor is a reflection of how we love ourselves as we are told to love them as we love ourselves (Matthew 22:39 and Mark 12:31). Our virtues should lead to fulfilling the obedience of these two great commandments while vices would lead us away from fulling these commands.

               From here, we can look at our approaches to physical, mental, and intellectual health.  All forms of health can be means to these great ends or they can become ends in and of themselves which transform into idols at that point.  In other words, when the goals of health supersede the goals of loving God and loving our neighbor as ourselves, they function as an idols.  In contrast, when the goals of health functions as a means to serve these two commandments, they become worthy virtues to pursue.

(Continued in Part 2)

Next in this Series… “Virtues to uphold in Whole Person Health: Part 2”

Read More →
Exemple

Do Not Segment Our Life – R.C. Sproul

“We do not segment our lives, giving some time to God, some to our business or schooling, while keeping parts to ourselves. The idea is to live all of our lives in the presence of God, under the authority of God, and for the honor and glory of God. That is what the Christian life is all about.” R.C. Sproul

              In a sense, the division of our time is practically divided into such silos of work, rest, entertainment, family, or church. Different days of the week and different schedules of the day routinely give time to different aspects of daily and weekly life. This can lead to intense attempts to balance our hours, to cover the needs of life with sufficient allotted time, and to find time to recover from the cycles of life.

              A fundamental error of man lies in this piecing together time resources to cover the necessities of such daily life without seeing the whole as life before God. We have forgotten that we are called to be stewards of our time as much as stewards of our tangible resources like money and our intangibles like skills and talents. Such stewardship attitude prevents us from losing sight that all of life is intended to be worked out before our Creator.

              No part of the day, of the week, or of our lifetimes are exempt from consideration in how they serve God. We cannot step away from this responsibility and choose how we spend a period of time without looking at how it serves God. While this initially feels burdensome, we are told in Matthew 11:28-30 that His burden is light.

              With this in mind, we can order our days, weeks, and years in light of our stewardship to God. We should order our beliefs, our thoughts and feelings, and our practices in light of seeking after that commendation of “good and faithful servant” (Matthew 25:23). We and others around us who follow this example will flourish in God’s blessing through such work.

Read More →
Exemple

              The following two paragraphs introduce you to the 23 page PDF attached and downloadable for those who seek a full-orbed Biblically-grounded exposition of Romans 13:1-7.  My primary goal for choosing this topic for a seminary class thesis paper was so that I could immerse myself in the full Biblical teaching on how Christians should respond to civil governments that are opposing God’s Word.  This has grounded my family’s approach to the current encroachment of the “State” upon other God-ordained institutions in our present day.  I hope that all of you who read it with a desire to find God’s truth will find His truths expounded clearly here.  Though written 10 years ago, its pertinence to contemporary issues demonstrates how God’s unchanging truth retains its foundational importance at all times.  I welcome your feedback and discussion as always.

              Twenty first century Christians stare in disbelief at society’s degradation into debauchery and post-modernism, asking themselves where they are and how they arrived here.  Even the more conservative non-believers often scratch their heads in amazement. Occasionally remembrances of America’s golden past instill some hope, but how these bygone freedoms may be regained perplexes many in the church.  By the power of what authority will justice be restored?  By the power of what authority will lawlessness be suppressed?  By the power of what authority will the world’s vain philosophies be subdued?  One who reads the Bible will answer that such authoritative power ultimately rests in God alone, yet still must ponder how to respond to the earthly authorities who undermine such righteous objectives.  The already, but not yet of reality means that Christians live not only under God’s sovereign authority, but also under earthly authorities, and the majority in our nation do not consistently submit their governing decisions to Biblical authority.  Dilemmas between obeying God and obeying rulers regularly confront today’s believer.

               In search of guidance, many have turned to Romans 13:1-7 in hopes that its explicit commands will either guide them or will justify their current behaviors.  Though considered the “locus classicus” on a Biblical view of civil government by the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, these verses nevertheless have been interpreted and applied in a wide variety of ways.  Simply stating that Romans 13 answers the question fully is insufficient as it does not address many themes of government (Bromiley, 545).  A proper and full-orbed hermeneutics of the topic is essential.  The grammatico-historical approach demands cultural examination of the writer and the recipients.  It demands a syntactical dissection along with a study of the key words.  It would demand a survey of views professed by our theological ancestors.  It would demand delaying a verdict until the whole counsel of God, both the Old and New Testaments, was consulted.  In surveying the broad scope of opinions on the topic, this last demand of an analogy of Scripture seems less satisfied than the prior demands and thus serves as the basis for this paper.  In widening the breadth of verses which weigh in on this question of civil authority and the authority of God, individual Christians in the contemporary milieu may begin to understand how to approach the dilemmas which have faced Christians throughout the ages, the same ones which seem to be more evident in our immediate social context.  (The English Standard Version has been used for all Scripture citations unless otherwise noted).

To read the full paper, download the PDF below.

Read More →
Exemple

By Jennifer Potter

              In Psalm 11 David laments, “If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do?” (Psalm 11:3)- a sentiment which fits well within the context of our current cultural dissolution, a dissolution resulting in part from cultural adherence to ideology over relationship, covenantal relationship.  When we base the principles underlying our thinking upon an ideology, we forfeit the stability of foundational covenantal principles in both the society and the individual …”for as [a man] thinketh in his heart, so is he (Proverbs 23:7 KJV)[E1] .” Therefore, let believers practice covenantal thinking, rejecting ideological influence, that a stable foundation may be put into place for both the individual and for the larger society. 

              In order to reject an ideological influence, we must be able to recognize its presence.  The word ideology originated with Enlightenment thinkers of the French Revolution who were looking to create a new science which would be useful in developing new truths to replace the old foundations of society. Simply put, ideology was the study of man’s ideas or sense perceptions.  This study was to form the new enlightened or rational societal foundation, one without need for transcendence. Man was to be the center of this endeavor. While ideology as a science did not persist, in the 1800s, a focus upon man and his own perceptions took hold of thinkers who were still searching for ways to alter the foundations of society and produce a man centered utopia.  Men more readily practiced eisegesis in their formulation of truth reading into their studies that which their own senses preferred.  This eisegesis resulted in myriads of thought systems such as the communism of Karl Marx revolutionizing cultures even into the present.

              Today, ideology as a term is used to describe a system of thought developed through man’s eisegetical study which proscribes acceptable thought and behavior centered around abstract premises with little care about their rationality. As they have moved into popular culture[E2] , the ongoing revolutionary fervor of man’s ideologies has eroded previous cultural foundations; now force is used to apply ever-morphing ideologies upon masses of people.

              While the practice of forcing others to fit into a narrow and evolving ideology seems to have conquered our present culture, believers need not be ensnared. Through covenantal thinking we can reject ideological absurdities. Our thinking, when based upon exegetical truth keeps us within the context of the covenantal relationships established by God. Understanding, developed from exegesis of the Word, means our lives can be defined by relational rootedness with the Creator and with one another. Paul tells the Ephesian church to “…try to discern what is pleasing to the Lord” in the context of their relationship to Him as His children (5:10 ESV).  In Ephesians 4, Paul encourages them to remember that “…they are members of one another” bounded by the covenant and the relationships it creates (4:25 ESV).  Covenantal relationship bounded by broad stipulations forms the foundation upon which we can return stability to our own lives and the life of our culture.  Ideologies tear down but covenantal relationship builds up.

              So, what do the righteous do when the foundations have crumbled?  According to Psalm 11, first remember that God is on his throne watching the children of man and testing the righteous until such time as the wicked and their false ideologies will be destroyed holding to the promise that ” …the upright shall behold His face (Ps. 11:7).”  In the interval, the time of testing, we live based upon covenantal thinking rejecting vain philosophies and ideologies (Colossians 2:8) and rightly exegeting the Truth of God found in the Bible. Embracing the covenantal relationship bounded by the Creator’s stipulations keeps us from falling for the narrow eisegesis of man centered ideologies thereby rebuilding the crumbling foundations and offering the stability of Truth. 

Further Study:

https://www.biblegateway.com. English Standard Version (ESV). Accessed September 4.2023.

https://www.biblegateway.com. King James Version (KJV). Accessed September 4, 2023.

Kennedy, E. (1989). A cultural history of the French Revolution (p. 20). New Haven: Yale University Press.

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Antoine-Louis-Claude-Comte-Destutt-de-Tracy[E3] ,

Cranston, M. (2023, June 17). ideology. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/ideology-society. Accessed June 17, 2023.

Sypnowich, Christine, “Law and Ideology”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/law-ideology/>. Accessed June 17, 2023.

Uzgalis, William, “John Locke”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/locke/>.  Accessed June 17, 2023.

Harper, D. (n.d.). Etymology of ideology. Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved July 15, 2023, from https://www.etymonline.com/word/ideology


 [E3](Britannica, Antoine Louis; Kennedy, 56)

Read More →
Exemple

Part 3: Various Scriptures Addressing God’s Approach to Man’s Health

               (Continued from Part 1: Old Testament Wordy Study and Part 2: New Testament Word Study

               Beyond the word studies considered in the Old and the New Testament in which physical or spiritual health were restored, many other Biblical references address various aspects of health where God through His Scripture authors addressed issues of physical health.   An attempt to formulate a Biblical view of whole person health would be deficient without considering these examples.

               We see some explicit instructions for both Old Testament Israel and the New Testament church which teach us that God cared for the physical needs of His people as well as the spiritual needs.  Beginning with the Old Testament in the Pentateuch, in the giving of the Ceremonial food laws, there were religious aspects and additionally there were physical health aspects which we better understand now.  Certain prohibited foods like those which feed on the filtering of sea water are now known to be ones with higher contaminants and parasites.  Avoiding these foods benefitted the Jew not only  spiritually in obedience to God’s commands, but also benefitted them physically. 

               In the New Testament, Paul could instruct Timothy to take a little wine for his stomach which apparently was causing some type of distress for Timothy.  Paul was not a masochistic leader telling others to buck up and take the punishment but wanted Timothy to be well physically (I Timothy 5:23). However, in balancing spiritual and physical health, Paul would also urge Christians to submit one’s body to the spiritual health race.  One’s physical health was important, but clearly not the primary and ultimate goal (I Corinthians 9:24

               Many other inferences to the importance of physical health to the reality and order of God’s created world then come to attention when looking for them even if they are not the primary focus of the particular Biblical text.  In Genesis, God created man out of the dust of the earth and created man with the need to breathe, eat, sleep, and relate with others.  This was God’s design.  Later we see the sin in taking of another human’s life whether in Cain killing Abel and receiving judgment or in other condemnations of murder (Genesis 4) up to and including the 10 commandments prohibition of murder (Exodus 20:13).  God also demonstrated care of the physical bodies of the Jews during the plagues on Egypt in the Exodus.  While the Egyptians suffered multiple bodily illnesses, the land of Goshen where the Hebrews lived was spared.  Even the Egyptians took notice of God’s preservation of the Hebrews.  During their time in the wilderness, God provided food and water to the wandering Hebrews rather than just making them to not need such physical things.  During the time of the famine, God provided for Elijah (I Kings 17).  While God cared for the physical needs of the Jews in the Old Testament time, He concurrently called them to pursue holiness over comforts and pleasures. 

               We also see pictures of God providing for the physical needs of believers and unbelievers in the New Testament accounts of Jesus’ works.  His first miracle addressed a physical need and also a relational need at the wedding feast in Cana as He made water into wine (John 2:1-12). As we already read, He healed countless diseases.  He often addressed spiritual and physical needs together either in series or simultaneously in these accounts.   God as the Father and in the humanity of the Son demonstrated God’s interest in caring for the physical, emotional, spiritual, and relational needs of his disciples and followers. 

               Taken together and considered in light of the principles gleaned from a broader understanding of the Bible we get a better sense of God’s view of health for mankind.  God created man with a body and a spirit, with a mind and with emotions relating to other humans.  He provided a garden to meet the physical needs.  He created a woman to meet relational needs.  He preserves humanity despite the rebellion of the fall and promises to restore man to a state of holiness again in the new heavens and new earth, still with body and soul in Revelations.  While we live upon the present earth waiting for the  future restored earth, he continues measures of temporary restoration in healing body, mind, spirit, and relationships through obedience and His Spirit’s work.

               The shalom he offers is one of wholeness without an exclusive focus on any one aspect of health, although He emphasizes the primacy of spiritual health with its greater impact in the eternal realm.  With this emphasis on the spiritual health of His children, He does not ignore the physical needs of His people. He uses many physical pictures to explain the blessings of the spiritual life so that the two are analogically tied together.  He mentions feasts in heaven (Revelation 19:7-9 and many others), the bread of life (John 6;35), and “living water” (John 4:14). In each, a physical reality images the spiritual blessings that God provides or offers to mankind.

               Our values should reflect His values for health if we are to be obedient. Shalom which includes body, mind, spirit, and relationship should be sought with spiritual health being primary and never sacrificed for any other aspect of health.  In this way, blessings can be enjoyed in all areas as none are inherently sinful unless they become an idol.  The blessings of whole person health are interdependent parts of a whole interacting in such a way that Ignoring one aspect, especially the spiritual, can limit enjoyment of others.  We can thus view ourselves as stewards of the gift of spiritual and physical life, caring for our body so that we can pursue spiritual health, mental strength, and relational health.  We should and can value the right ordering and functioning of our whole being rather than an overemphasis on a single aspect.

Next in the Series… Virtues to uphold in Whole Person Health

Read More →