Mental Health

archive

Home Tag : Mental Health

Exemple

               Jill glances at the reflection before her but recoils not from the actual portrayal of her face by the light, but from the meaning overlaid by life upon her countenance.  The reflection reminds her that others have left her along the road of her long sorrow.  The reflection reminds her that the brokenness of family members’ own struggles strands her on a lonely island in the ongoing buzz of life which then cannot hear her cry in the night nor the day.  The reflection reminds her that nothing has relieved the suffering lying behind that reflection.  No therapy, no medication, no well-intended but misdirected words of friends have lifted that reflection out of darkness.  She knows that she will see that reflection tomorrow and the day after and so on until her eyes open no more.  She does not expect the spirit behind that reflection to remind her of anything different in those future encounters. 

               Jill does not realize that millions of others daily recoil at their own reflections.  They gasp at the reflected darkness of various mental illness shadow. The rest of today’s world continues on unaware of these millions until the news reports that one of them has chosen to put an end to the daily ritual of glancing at their own soul in the mirror.  Should we care? Should we act?  How far must this go and how many must fall before we acknowledge how tangled and knotted are the strings of life woven by today’s misunderstanding of reality as manifested in the mental health crisis presently weighing upon us..

               The specter of Jill’s suffering along with the millions of others rumored by the media deserves an answer.  Addressing such a problem as the multilayered complexity of our current mental health crisis requires understanding where the tangled mess begins and then following through the whole tangle to find the solution.  This stands out rather like a multilayered knot in your child’s shoelace.   Attempting to untangle and solve the knot starting halfway through it will either leave you at best with half a knot or possibly even worse with one and a half knots, i.e. a bigger mess than you started with.  The mental health in which we and millions of our neighbors are presently suffering, likewise, cannot be solved without going to the root of the tangle and working out from there.  The solutions offered by the secular world do not aim at the root of the tangle.  Similarly, the solutions currently present in the broader church are falling short and need revision.  The problem requires a solution that can only come from God’s design for the family and the church as the foundations of society, but which the current broader church is not leading as it is called to do.

               The process for untangling something so complex and so multilayered as the mental health condition of our society obviously requires more time, energy, and steps than untying your child’s knotted shoelaces, but the basic steps are strikingly similar.  First, we must be sure that a problem really exists.  Second, once we realize that the problem is real, we must take a big picture look and understand the depth and breadth of the problem (its nature).  Third, with a big picture understanding, we must find the best starting point from which to begin the disentanglement, or in other words, we must identify the root cause or causes of the tangle. Fourth, our response must be sufficiently powered and correctly focused while minimizing hindrances to have a hope of success.

               Over the coming installments of this series, I will walk through this process as it applies to the state of our society’s mental health crisis.  By answering each of these first three questions we will lead into the most important answer to the fourth question: how the work of the family and the church lie at the root of untangling this tangle mess of a mental health crisis.

Step One of Disentanglement: Confirmation that a Problem Exists

               Before allocating extensive time and resources to this issue, we should confirm the truth of the contemporary claim that a mental health crisis exists.  This applies whether referring to either the setting  of our own community or more broadly to our nation.  Just because your 4-year-old says that they can’t untie their shoe does not mean that it is knotted.  Just because the news media and experts say that we have a mental health crisis does it mean that we need to respond to their alarm bells.  Just because a Jill, as described earlier, looks into her mirror with sadness and despair does not mean we have a societal crisis.  We also don’t want to extrapolate our own mental health struggles of anxiety or depression across everyone assuming that every one of us “feels” the same as we do.  Before we devote much time, effort, or money into untying knotted shoelaces, we should be confident that a knot really exists.

               With these cautions in mind, we consider how we might assess the situation and determine if a problem truly exists or not.  Most of you reading this will not be mental health experts or public health experts with knowledge and extensive access to data sources that you trust.  We will have to find sources upon whom we can trust to provide sufficient and accurate evidence for a problem’s existence.  We must admit that looking to our own family and friends’ current experiences of mental illness does not mean that we have an epidemic or a national crisis.  We or our loved ones may have a crisis, but that is a somewhat different problem and solution than having a societal crisis.  The sources must be realistically free of bias, avoiding unnecessary conflicts of interest.  We don’t need a deceitful mechanic telling us that we need to replace our carburetor and we don’t need government officials telling us that a crisis exists so they can offer their solutions at our tax expense.  On the other hand, our sources will have to be sufficiently involved and knowledgeable in the mental health world for them to know something worth considering as a trusted and reliable/accurate source.

               We then want more than one source so that we can be more confident that even the well-intentioned and unbiased did not make an honest mistake in their assessment.  We might initially look to a governmentally derived report or study, but would also appreciate a study from a private or academic source that we trust.  We might also try to find sources from outside the usual ones which agree with our worldview so that we avoid having our own echo biases from other’s who think like us.  Then we would also consider personal experience whether in our family, our church, or our community.   For those of us in the health care world, we can also look to the experiences of our patients as informal surveys of what is happening in the broader culture.  Then we must evaluate each of these sources for bias, accuracy, breadth, depth and other factors to be sure it is worthy of our including it in our analysis.  Finally, by comparing and combining these sources we can develop a better appreciation for whether a problem exists or not.  This process also prepares us for later steps in our attempts to untangle the mental health knot.

               These quotes provide a starting point, offering different perspectives and statistics demonstrating why we should be concerned with our nation’s mental health:

               From Abilene Christian University: “The statistics are startling. Between 2007 and 2019, adolescents reporting a major depressive episode increased 60 percent. Tragically, during a similar time frame, the suicide death rate among 10–24 year olds increased 56 percent. This issue isn’t confined to young people. In 2020, anxiety and depression increased globally by 25 percent. Depression and anxiety rates exploded so rapidly that, at the end of 2021, the U.S. Surgeon General declared a “devastating” national mental health crisis.

               From CNN:  “Nine out of 10 adults said ​they believed that there’s a mental health crisis in the US today. Asked to rate the severity of six specific mental health concerns, Americans put the opioid epidemic near the top, with more than two-thirds of people identifying it as a crisis rather than merely a problem. More than half identified mental health issues among children and teenagers as a crisis, as well as severe mental illness in adults.”

From SAMHSA: 

               “Fact: Mental health issues can affect anyone. In 2020, about:

               One in 5 American adults experienced a mental health condition in a given year

               One in 6 young people have experienced a major depressive episode

               One in 20 Americans have lived with a serious mental illness, such as schizophrenia, bipolar                disorder, or major depression

               Additionally, suicide is a leading cause of death in the United States. In fact, it was the second                leading cause of death for people ages 10-24. Suicide has accounted for the loss of more than                45,979 American lives in 2020, nearly double the number of lives lost to homicide.”

From Pew Research Center:  “Mental health and the pandemic: What U.S. surveys have found:

               1. “At least four-in-ten U.S. adults (41%) have experienced high levels of psychological distress at                some point during the pandemic, …”

               2. “More than a third of high school students have reported mental health challenges during the                pandemic. …”

               3. “Mental health tops the list of worries that U.S. parents express about their kids’ well-being,                according to a fall 2022 Pew Research Center survey of parents with children younger than 18. In                that survey, four-in-ten U.S. parents said they’re extremely or very worried about their children                struggling with anxiety or depression….”

               4. “Among parents of teenagers, roughly three-in-ten (28%) are extremely or very worried that                their teen’s use of social media could lead to problems with anxiety or depression, according to                a Spring 2022 survey of parents with children ages 13 to 17.”

               5. “Looking back, many K-12 parents say the first year of the coronavirus pandemic had a                negative effect on their children’s emotional health.”

               As I find further helpful sources to support the existence of a crisis, I will try to return to this blog and post those sources at the end.  I am open to your sharing of ones you find, even ones that argue against a crisis if you find some.  For now, I have also mentioned a few sources of proof in other blogs and can say that between several studies I have read and my experience in our clinic where we are truly seeing more and more mental health issues in our patients, there is a mental health crisis which seems to be worsening.  Various studies indicate that people are more stressed and experiencing more mental health dysfunction with more diagnoses being made and more meds being prescribed.  Weekly, I receive the same comments from my staff in caring for our patients that we are seeing more and more suffering both physically and mentally in those seeking our help.  Many experts are expressing their concern in news interviews, articles, and books.  Government and media are beating the same drum over and over, proclaiming that we need more mental health workers (I will address this inadequate response soon, but for now, their repetition acknowledges that they see a problem).  The consensus of these sources indicate that we have a problem – that the mental health shoelaces are truly knotted.

               If you doubt this assessment, I applaud your diligence to be more confident before responding to a problem that you are not sure actually exists.  If this describes you, take time to solidify your opinion one way or the other before proceeding to the rest of this series.  On the other hand, if you are in agreement with the knot’s existence in our society as well as its importance, return to read part two describing the nature of the mental health crisis.  As you wait, do a little research on your own and begin formulating your own view of this issue.  This work will prepare you for understanding in the next essay.

Bibliography:

Gramlich, John. “Mental Health and the Pandemic: What U.S. Surveys Have Found.” Pew Research Center, 2 Mar. 2023, www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/03/02/mental-health-and-the-pandemic-what-u-s-surveys-have-found/. Accessed 12 Nov. 2023.

Krause, Chelsi. “The Mental Health Crisis: What’s Going on and What Can We Do.” Abilene Christian University, 9 May 2022, acu.edu/2022/05/09/the-mental-health-crisis-whats-going-on-and-what-we-can-do/#:~:text=In%202020%2C%20anxiety%20and%20depression. Accessed 12 Nov. 2023.

McPhillips, Deidre. “90% of US Adults Say the United States Is Experiencing a Mental Health Crisis, CNN/KFF Poll Finds.” CNN, 5 Oct. 2022, www.cnn.com/2022/10/05/health/cnn-kff-mental-health-poll-wellness/index.html.

SAMHSA. “Mental Health Myths and Facts.” Www.samhsa.gov, SAMHSA, 8 Feb. 2023, www.samhsa.gov/mental-health/myths-and-facts. Accessed 12 Nov. 2023.

Read More →
Exemple

                 Today, people from a variety of backgrounds recognize that we have a deteriorating mental health problem in our society which began before 2020, but has been exacerbated by it. While many will debate the causes, severity, and details of this problem, most admit that we live in an age of heightened sadness and anxiety expressed in a variety of symptoms and diagnoses.  We can look together at statistics further below with some general agreement, but as soon as solutions are offered, divergences begin.  We may agree that something must change, but how we view the problem determines how we believe that we should respond.  While we may be able to address our own or our family’s mental health issues, the collective societal response is best exemplified in the political proposals of those in leadership across various offices.  These legislative proposals concerning mental health care demonstrate our leaders fundamentally flawed beliefs about the mental health problem.

                Before considering the statistics, my simple definition of mental health according to worldly standards includes someone feeling good about life, having the absence of significant “dis”-ease which hinders functionality and productivity in daily life.  This plays out not as a complete absence of emotional fluctuations as with a science fiction robot. Instead mental health is viewed as an  spectrum of emotions which includes some degrees of sadness, anxiousness, joy, mourning, and other emotions.  The intensities match the context of the situation, and their duration is appropriate for the circumstances without significantly interfering with life functions.      

               While the world’s general view of mental health tends towards a focus on individual’s absence of “dis”-ease, a Biblical view of health informed by Biblical support emphasizes a Hebrew term “shalom”.  Shalom encompasses a more wholistic and positive view of health.  It includes physical and mental/spiritual health as well as relational health with God and with other people.  This shalom focuses on the presence of “well-being” rather than just the absence of negative symptoms. (for a further explanation of shalom and other Biblical words regarding health, see prior essay). 

               The world’s approach is to aim against “dis”-ease, rather than towards shalom. If we as Christians believe that God’s goal of mental health for us should be shalom for people as both individuals and in community, then we should evaluate whether the approach taken by the world and by our governmental leaders will lead to shalom or away from it.

               Assuming for the moment that the methods of assessment by the authors of the following surveys and studies are valid and portray a relatively accurate picture of the state of mental health in our nation, we see that we truly have a problem.  Elsewhere we can address the shortcomings of these methods and the factors they measured, but for now let’s take them at their face value.  A December 2022 edition of the journal Pediatrics reported on their comparison of mental health diagnoses reported in primary care between the year prior to COVID beginning in February of 2020 and two periods after this watershed in 2020 and 2021.  They found that eating disorder diagnoses in children almost doubled from 9.3 visits per 1000 patients per year to 18.3.  They also found the overall annualized mood disorder visits increased from 65.3 per 1000 patients per year to 94.0.  Basically, this second statistic indicates that almost 1 in 10 visits in pediatric primary care were for a mood related symptom. 

               In another study by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention reported by the Pew Center for Research (LINK) in 2021, high school students were evaluated on their self-reports of mental health symptoms.  In public and private high schools, 37% reported that their mental health was not good during the pandemic and 44% reported that in the prior year, they had experienced sufficient sadness or hopelessness for 2 weeks or more which led to their stopping some activity. 

               From the website by the National Alliance on Mental Health (LINK), we find further disturbing statistics.  Their “Mental Health by the Numbers” paint enough of a picture that we don’t need to go any deeper.  They list the following in a longer list on their site:

  • About 1 in 5 adults in the U.S. experience some mental illness each year.
  • About 1 in 6 children between the ages of 6 and 17 years experience mental illness each year.
  • For children aged 10 to 14 years, suicide is the second leading cause of death.

               Numbers like these can tell us that a problem exists and that the current response does not appear adequate.  However, they do not necessarily explain how to change this situation. A much deeper look into the root causes of this situation would be needed and is not in the direct scope of this essay.  Neither will I provide support for my belief that there will always be some prevalence of mental “dis”-ease in a fallen world where sin is still rampant.  Until the New Heavens and New Earth, there will always be some degree of poor mental health.  For now we turn our attention to the response of our political leaders and what their response tells us about their view of the problem and its roots.

               We can gain a sense of how our Tennessee legislators view mental health by considering a few of the recent bills they proposed in the 2023 Special Session called by Governor Bill Lee for August of 2023. This session is now adjourned and the following bills were not passed, but these bills can be returned or refiled to committee and the Senate or House floor for consideration in the next session in January of 2024.  We as a state still must contend with these bills for better or worse and with the worldview foundations of our legislators which underlie these bills’ proposals.

               We look first at SB7079 and its companion bill in the state House, HB7035 which proposed loan repayment incentives to mental health professional students in exchange for a required number of years of their service in Tennessee.  The beliefs or assumptions of legislators can be deduced from this proposal.  They appear to believe that we have a shortage of mental health providers and by raising that number, we can improve mental health.  They appear to believe that experts in mental health can alleviate the problem.  They appear to believe that more money spent on these experts will alleviate the problem.  By not mentioning any other potential resources like family, church, or community, they suggest a belief that these factors are not important especially when considering that no other legislation in the special session addressed those factors.  They appear to believe that the views of mental health professionals, which in general conflict with the previously stated Biblical view of health, can solve the problem.  I believe these are plausible inferences to make from their proposed bill.

               We look next at SB 7032and HB 7066 which proposed the coverage of at least three mental health telemedicine visits to youth.  Besides many of the same appearances gleaned from the previous bill, we can add a few more.  The legislators appear to believe that children should be able to freely access these services without parental involvement as that is not mentioned in the bill.  The bill has no mention of the ability of parents to oversee either the individual mental health care of their children, nor have any say in the collective work of that system.  Beyond that, while the bill has possible provisions for further visits beyond three initial visits, the legislators appear to believe that short term interventions can be sufficient for such chronic issues.  That is a debatable opinion and this bill, if ever passed, will undermine parental rights.

               We next look at SB 7016 and HB 7076 which proposed adding 1 school counselor per every 250 students in the public school system.  This would add over 3800 new counseling positions in 1800 schools across the state at a potential cost of about 280 million dollars.  Again we see the appearance that legislators believe mental health experts know best for our children and should have access to children potentially without parental involvement or even parental awareness at times.  They also appear to believe that schools are a good location for such services.  This fits with the central role school frequently plays in the life of families, shaping their activities and relationships around schools’ calendars and connections.  (This dovetails with the mindset of the federal government since the schools receiving federal funding are no longer required to get parental consent for mental health services source. LINK.)

               We finally look at SB 7074 and HB 7069 which proposes that Tennessee seek federal waivers through Tenncare to receive more federal money to increase mental health services in Tennessee.  The legislators proposing this bill clearly believe that federal government money flowing into Tennessee is a good option to meet the need for mental health care.  They would appear to not be concerned about any regulations that such money would bring from the federal government that would dictate how Tennessee mental health provider treat Tennesseans with mental health problems. 

               In summary, our governmental leaders appear to believe in the following principles behind their solutions:

  • Experts can solve the problem
  • Government money from the state or federal government can fix the problem
  • Other resources like family, church, and community do not play a role in a solution
  • Understanding the root causes of the problem are not necessary for a solution
  • For children’s mental health, parental and family involvement are not necessary
  • Without a mention of the contribution of sinful behavior to the issue, they don’t consider it a factor

               Are these principles ones which Tennesseans agree with?  These foundational principles regarding what our legislators believe about mental health and the relationship between parents and children give me great concern as a Christian parent and a Christian physician.  I should not be surprised as much of our society sees little problem with these foundational principles.  Even our churches and their leaders don’t quite understand that a Biblical approach to mental health should aim at shalom rather try to resolve “dis”-ease of a worldly view of mental health.  I would argue with Psalm 11 that the righteous must consider what to do next in the face of the foundations being destroyed and having been replaced by faulty worldview foundations.  It is high time to return to Biblical principles including the striving for shalom rather than the reduction of “dis”-ease through more governmental mental health intervention.

In future blogs… What should the role of state or federal government be in mental health? 

Bibliography

Potter MD, E. (2023, June 1). True Health: What does it include in Biblical terms? (Part1) – Whole Person Whole Life. Whole Person Whole Life. https://wholepersonwholelife.com/true-health-what-does-it-include-biblical/

Mental health and the pandemic: What U.S. surveys have found. By John Gramlich Pew Research Center. March 2, 2023.  Accessed August 30, 2023. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/03/02/mental-health-and-the-pandemic-what-u-s-surveys-have-found/

National Alliance on Mental Health. Mental Health By the Numbers. Last updated: April 2023. Accessed September 4, 2023. https://www.nami.org/mhstats

Hoge, A. (2023, August 29). Biden Expands ObamaCare For Mental Health Services at Schools to Psychoanalyze Children 0 to 21. News with Views. Accessed September 4, 2023. https://newswithviews.com/biden-expands-obamacare-for-mental-health-services-at-schools-to-psychoanalyze-children-0-to-21/

Read More →