November 2023

archive

Home November 2023

Exemple

Excerpt #5 of “Analysis of Romans 13:1-7 in Light of the Analogy of Scripture”

               Given the length of the full paper I recently published on this site, I am posting excerpts which emphasize specific principles within the paper.  Hopefully, these excerpts will not only encourage you to read the actual paper, but also think more deeply about the role of Romans 13:1-7 in our response to both Godly and ungodly civil government in our day and time.  A proper understanding and obedience to Scripture is critical today as always.  This particular Scripture has been mishandled in so many ways that a methodical approach to its exegesis is needed to avoid further error by both individual Christians and the broader church.  The pressures being exerted upon true Christianity by the contemporary civil government demand a Biblical response informed by Romans 13:1-7 and the other Scriptures addressed within this paper.

               (These excerpts are posted in the order as found in the paper, but do not include the entirety of the paper which combined.  Only the PDF contains all sections of the paper.)

Particular Applications to Earthly Authority: Second Broad Principle

               The application of God’s authority may be seen clearly in the areas of His ordaining, directing, commanding, judging, and having dominion over all civil government.  First, God’s creation or ordaining of government may be argued from several verses out of both Testaments.  Daniel 4:17 describes God as not only ruling the kingdoms of men, but giving it “to whom he will”.  Daniel 2:44-45 foretells how God would set up a kingdom which would overturn all the prior ones.  In Jeremiah 27:6, God describes how he gave lands into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar.  Romans 9:17 recounts God’s words to Pharaoh showing that God had raised him up for the very purpose of showing His power.  Isaiah expresses God’s giving certain rulers to the people (Isaiah 3: 4-5).  Additionally, when man tried to set up kings outside of God’s expressed will, God considered this disobedience (Hosea 8:3-4). 

               In spite of these examples some would argue that God only ordained institutions, not rulers. They do so to avoid accusations of evil against God.  As proof of God’s individual ordination, I Kings 12:15 describes how Jeroboam’s rebellion and subsequent kingdom was “a turn of events from the Lord”, leaving no doubt that even a rebellion was under God’s rule as God had commanded Jeroboam to do so.  The Bible’s description of Nebuchadnezzar as God’s “servant” in Jeremiah 27:6 and Jesus’ dialogue with Pontius Pilate in John 19:10-11 also confirm that God ordains not only offices, but the rulers that fill those offices (Cole). 

Read MORE HERE.

Read More →
Exemple

              Given the possibility for our thoughts and feelings to press upon and to alter our beliefs and values in the aftermath of significant life events, the potential for life trauma to change our worldview deserves some reflection.  Trauma might be one of the most forceful opportunities through which our beliefs and values may be influenced by our thoughts and feelings.  Of course, the immediate effects of trauma stand out as we may even question whether we were wrong about our view of reality. However, either the residual intensity of the initial trauma or an ongoing and repetitive trauma may not only lead to questions, but to actual changes in our beliefs and values through how we think and feel about the trauma. Underlying these lasting conscious changes, significant biochemical and structural changes can be found in the brain after such trauma.  Outside the brain, changes in the levels of various hormones can be observed in the various hormones.  While one is not left to fate if one intentionally addresses such biological and emotional changes, ignoring these biochemical responses could leave one at the mercy of the trauma.  Traumatic events of any significant severity deserve pause in the flow of life to process the conscious and unconscious influences they press into our beliefs and values.

               We have discussed in prior essays the interaction between thoughts and feeling of heads and hearts interacting with beliefs and values.  Residing a step or so outside of these thoughts and feelings, the events of our lives shape us in both subtle and in profound ways.  So many of these events are positive and enjoyable, yet in our fallen world, creation cries out as wickedness and brokenness press their reality upon our lives.  The pain or suffering we experience from these negative influences and their aftermaths can be described as trauma.  Minor trauma may leave emotional or physical bruises that can fade in a short time while more significant trauma can leave much longer lasting marks on us, even permanent scars. Such marks of trauma may be physical in ongoing disability, deformity or discomfort.  They may also be emotional in altering how we feel about situations or people similar to those involved in the initiating traumatic event.  There may be changes in what we think as we face situations which remind us of the original trauma. 

               While even less intense and less prolonged trauma does not always produce lasting changes, at time it does leave a more permanent mark.  In such situations, it may change what we believe about reality.  Such trauma may cause us to view reality and life as inherently dangerous, thus causing us to expect more trauma, and potentially cause us to not trust others.  Such trauma may lead to our changing what values are important to us.  Safety and security may arise in our list of priority values whether in a physical sense or possibly in a relational sense of not getting close to others.  This could cause us to slow down and seek much more understanding or assurance before we commit to something that appears to pose a risk.  These changes may fade over time or may become a part of who we are for a lifetime.

               As neuroscience and neuropsychology advanced, we came to recognize actual physical changes in one’s body from such significant trauma.  Different parts of the brain can increase or decrease in size, especially in areas of the limbic system, the brain subsystem which processes emotions including the “fight or flight” response.  For example, the amygdala, which processes fear, can change in size with repeated trauma.  The change has been reported to go either way and whether the direction of change is a result of, or a cause of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms has been debated (Morey et al 2012 vs. Kuo et al 2012). 

Outside of the brain, the processing and outworking of our hormones also changes.  Adverse childhood experiences have been shown to change the response of the adrenal glands to future stressors.  Adrenal glands can alter their production of cortisol and adrenaline after prolonged repeated trauma which has led to a poorly labeled syndrome of “adrenal fatigue”.  Such changes in our brains and hormones result in our responding differently to future situations and future traumas.  Responses to future trauma may be augmented in some people, even resulting in PTSD while in others, response may be blunted and affects flattened.

               Trauma of life thus impacts our thoughts and feelings through these biological pathways, yet thoughts and feelings about trauma also impact how we experience the trauma.  Prior beliefs and values alter the way we experience the initial trauma as well as alter how we re-experience the similarities of future trauma.  While this would paint a grim picture in which we feel ourselves to be helpless victims in the fallen world, through an active approach to such trauma, we can actively engage and influence the resulting changes to our view of the world.  In contrast, a passive approach under the belief that we cannot change what happens to us or how we respond to those traumas will leave us at the mercy of the trauma. 

               In order to engage effectively, we must engage the trauma cognitively in several ways.  We must process it cognitively and shine light on its effects, both actual and potential, honestly assessing the impacts.  This requires the belief that we have some choice in the matter and a high value on our own well-being.  It also requires that we believe that what is wrong can be made right again rather than being hopeless.  For the Christian, we must trust that God works all things together for good (Romans 8:28) and that He can bring good out of even the bad (many examples from the Bible).  Faith in such eternal truths as found in the Bible will shape our response to trauma if we choose to apply them and trust them.

               Traumatic events of any significant severity deserve pause in the flow of life to process the conscious and unconscious influences they press into our beliefs and values.  These traumas will inevitably impact our thoughts and our feelings as well as beliefs and values, but we do not have to be helpless in the face of such impacts.  We can actively shape our experience both in the present and in the future even as the experience shapes us (2 Corinthians 10:5).  The more actively we engage our thoughts and feelings after trauma, the greater the chance of coming out well in health and well-being through right beliefs and values.

Next in this Series… “The Modern Contribution to Our Brokenness”

References:

Morey, R. A., Gold, A. L., LaBar, K. S., Beall, S. K., Brown, V. M., Haswell, C. C., Nasser, J. D., Wagner, H. R., McCarthy, G., & Mid-Atlantic MIRECC Workgroup (2012). Amygdala volume changes in posttraumatic stress disorder in a large case-controlled veterans group. Archives of general psychiatry69(11), 1169–1178. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.50

Kuo, J. R., Kaloupek, D. G., & Woodward, S. H. (2012). Amygdala volume in combat-exposed veterans with and without posttraumatic stress disorder: a cross-sectional study. Archives of general psychiatry, 69(10), 1080–1086. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.73

Read More →
Exemple

Excerpt #4 of “Analysis of Romans 13:1-7 in Light of the Analogy of Scripture”

               Given the length of the full paper I recently published on this site, I am posting excerpts which emphasize specific principles within the paper.  Hopefully, these excerpts will not only encourage you to read the actual paper, but also think more deeply about the role of Romans 13:1-7 in our response to both Godly and ungodly civil government in our day and time.  A proper understanding and obedience to Scripture is critical today as always.  This particular Scripture has been mishandled in so many ways that a methodical approach to its exegesis is needed to avoid further error by both individual Christians and the broader church.  The pressures being exerted upon true Christianity by the contemporary civil government demand a Biblical response informed by Romans 13:1-7 and the other Scriptures addressed within this paper.

               (These excerpts are posted in the order as found in the paper, but do not include the entirety of the paper which combined.  Only the PDF contains all sections of the paper.)

God’s Law Limits Government’s Punishments

               Though the law of God was meant to curtail disobedience in all spheres, it also limits man’s punishment of the wicked to acceptable degrees.  In Exodus 21:23-27 and Leviticus 24:18-23, the well-known lex talionis, often viewed in a negative light, actually prevented far more damaging punishments from being inflicted on the guilty. As Schwertley argues in God’s Law for Modern Man, the goal was justice.  He also quotes Greg Bahnsen’s book, Theonomy, pp. 437-438 in further support of this.  Deuteronomy 16:18-20 further confirms this intention by commanding the rulers to “judge the people with righteous judgment”, “not pervert justice”, “not show partiality”, “not accept a bribe”, and to follow only justice.  Through this obedience they were to inherit the land which God had given them.  The impartiality was to extend both to citizens of Israel and strangers in the land (Leviticus 24:22).  Based on Deuteronomy 4:1-8 (particularly verses 7 and 8), Schwertley points out in God’s Law for Modern Man that the law was also meant to be a model for other nations.  There the nearness of God was extolled as were the laws of the Israelites.

               As further examples of its goal of justice, not punitive purposes, the Law included stipulations for self-defense in Exodus 22:2-4 and required atonement for unsolved murders in Deuteronomy 21:1-9.  In fact, government itself could be the enactment of judgment as seen in Hosea 13:11 where God says that He would give a king to His people “in His wrath”.  St. Thomas Aquinas noted this in work “On Kingship or the The Governance of Rulers” as he addressed how the people should seek help in resisting a tyrant (Sigmund, 25).  Both Biblical narratives and propositions therefore demand the doctrine that God is the ultimate authority, ordaining civil government for mankind’s benefit through delegation and jurisdictional division.

Read MORE HERE

Read More →